HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
SERVICES AGENCY
May 2, 2007
9:00 a.m.
Commissioners' Conference Room
APPROVED 7/11/07
Commissioner Faye Stewart presided with Commissioners Bill Dwyer, Bill
Fleenor, Bobby Green, Sr., Hugh Massengill, Barbara Moorehouse and Peter
Sorenson present. County Administrator
Bill Van Vactor, County Counsel Teresa Wilson and Recording Secretary Melissa
Zimmer were also present.
1. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Henry Luvert, Eugene, indicated some
issues have come to his attention about HACSA.
He said it was discouraging to be discussing an agency that is supposed
to be community oriented. He said at
the work place the issues around diversity have not been dealt with. He commented that the work environment is
hostile and management doesn’t think that diversity is important. He said according to their records,
diversity has not been important. He
said they wrote a letter and didn’t receive any response. He said they sent people over to try to
develop some communication with them but as far as the NAACP is concerned, they
had not received any response or respect and the environment hasn’t
changed. He noted there is no plan to
change the environment. He said the
last time an African American male applied to HACSA, he was denied a job
because they didn’t feel comfortable with him.
Luvert said that person filed a lawsuit against HACSA. He indicated the environment hasn’t changed
and it wasn’t important to the Board because it wasn’t brought up as part of
the evaluation of the workers.
Stewart stated he hadn’t received
an official letter from the NAACP. He
read articles about the subject in the newspaper. He had received an e-mail copy from someone else. He indicated the Board receives regular
audits from different federal agencies on the performance of the HACSA unit and
they had never seen anything that had been an alarm to them.
He said he took the concerns of
Luvert seriously. He didn’t know
how much he could discuss because of the litigation.
Luvert said he didn’t talk
about a particular case, he discussed the work environment. He said in the past when an issue had come
up, there had never been a problem with people calling him before it gets to
the point it had gotten to. He
commented the people at HACSA did know what was going on and didn’t think it
was important to develop any communication.
He said they are a community activist group and deal with people’s
rights. He said if there is no
diversity, the issues around diversity don’t get asked.
Massengill stated he had
been on the Board for three years and only received two communications. He said one was from Alan Brown, NAACP, who
had comments and a list of questions for him that were the same questions as in
the newspaper. He asked if the person
involved with litigation sent the questions to him.
Luvert said they have
hundreds of members and they have committees who work with people. He indicated there is a legal redress with
the NAACP. He said they deal with
issues that come up. He didn’t ask any
of the questions today. He was asking about
the work environment and the lack thereof of diversity within the department.
Dwyer said it is important
to be diverse and have every department in Lane County reflect the community at
large. He said the goals were admirable
and they should strive to achieve those goals.
He commented that they have had serious budget problems. He said they have had diversity training
program for all employees and made people aware of it. He thought HACSA could do a better job and
be more cognizant that they are providing housing to all people. He was committed to make the agency more
responsive to people of color.
Luvert said they want to be
heard around the issues that affect them in the community. He said it doesn’t
have to cost money to communicate. He
stated guidance hasn’t come forth. He
said as the process goes on, there might be some money that would be
needed. He thought HACSA needs to
broaden their scope.
Chris Todis, HACSA,
indicated this issue is about performance and not about race. He said that HACSA has gone from 100
employees to 78 employees in the past three years. He said the people at HACSA have worked there for a long
time. He commented that there are factors
in the case and they are complicated.
He stated that he had never received a letter from the NAACP as it was
just sent to the Board. He said that
Luvert made some comments that were untrue.
Green said if the NAACP has
the resources to help HACSA be more proactive, he would be committed to make
sure that happens. He said there is a
lot of skill and expertise in the organization.
Sorenson thought it was
important to raise issues about the effort that is being made for
diversity. He didn’t think that money
was the issue. He stated that
discrimination is against the law and
he was committed to do more to achieve a degree of equality and diversity.
Luvert commented that he
came to talk about the work environment and any reference to a case is not
something he brought up. He discussed
the environment and the lack of avenues to improve the environment of color.
2. COMMISSIONERS'
REMONSTRANCE
Massengill stated that as a member of the Board, he
didn’t want anyone contacting him. He
said he was legally naïve in handling issues.
He thought it was arrogant for the person in the lawsuit to go to
various organizations and convince that organization to take that person’s
questions. He thought it was
unethical. He resented the fact that he
was being accused of not working on something when it was not brought to him.
Dwyer said when there is a lawsuit filed and there are
questions that might pertain to a lawsuit, he suggested that any question that
might relate to HACSA be referred to counsel.
Moorehouse said she had been on the Board since
January 2006 and this was the first time that this had come up. She said given what is taking place, she had
no clarity about what she could talk about that might influence a pending
case. She wanted clarification and
definition on what she could discuss.
She was upset on how this was presented to them.
3. REGULAR BUSINESS
a. ORDER 07-5-2-1H/In the Matter of Approving
the Amended Limited Partnership Agreement for the New Winds Apartments.
Jim McCoy, HACSA, reported the New Winds Apartment
(because they worked so hard to get the rents down) is completely funded by
grants and tax credits. He said it is
an 18 unit project located in Florence designed for people who are severely
psychiatrically disabled. He said in
2005 the state put out an RFP asking for people who were interested in
developing it to respond to their proposal.
He said they were selected and have been working to carry out all of the
development steps. He commented that
the due diligence was intensive. He
stated the project was welcome in the City of Florence and something they had
been wanting for a long time. He
indicated the square footage price is $127 per square foot and the land was
$118,000.
MOTION: to approve ORDER 07-5-21H.
Green MOVED, Dwyer SECONDED.
VOTE 7-0.
b. REPORT/Fair Housing Audit.
Chuck Hauk, HACSA, reported in March 2006 they were
chosen by the office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity out of the Seattle
Regional Office of HUD for a comprehensive audit. He said the purpose of the audit was to review their practices
with Title 6 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that prohibits discrimination on
the basis of race, color or national origin and Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act that provides they don’t discriminate on the basis of
disability. He said they were
specifically advised that the audit was not as a result of a complaint. He said two investigators came down and they
spent a week in their offices. He said
they reviewed and took about 1,000 pages of documentation. He said they reviewed applications and
waiting lists, administration, tenanting, delivery of services, reasonable
combinations of Section 504 accessibility and program requirements, reasonable
combination of services to persons with limited English proficiency and both of
the public housing and Section 8 programs. He added they also reviewed an
extensive number of files and reports.
He said they interviewed residents and went out to different sites to
see if they were accessible.
Hauk indicated HACSA received a November 2006 a letter
on the Title 6 Compliance Review determining that they were fully compliant
with Title 6 with no findings and a month letter they received a similar letter
stating they were fully in compliant with Section 504, the Rehabilitation Act
with no findings.
Green noted there was a concern raised from HUD on
November 30 about a data entry error.
He asked what the data errors could have been.
Hauk responded that they hired an outsider to come in
to do a comprehensive review. He said
they had just switched to a new computer system trying to convert the data from
the old system to the new system and it resulted in errors. He added there were data errors where people
had been waiting for a long time when in fact they had not, the wrong year was
put down. He added they found a number
of their applicants had self-selected which communities they wanted to live
in. He said that some minority
applicants only wanted to live in a one bedroom in McKenzie Village but they
have a limited number of units there.
He said they had a right to designate the geographic area where they
want to live but because they have 100 plus one bedroom units in the Eugene
complex and only in 22 Springfield, they would have to wait.
Sorenson asked if HACSA reviewed this with groups or
organizations in the community that would be interested in whether they were
complying with the Civil Rights Act.
Hauk said they shared it with their own tenant
advisory group and with the Fair Housing Board of Oregon. He didn’t officially send anything out to
the public.
Sorenson wanted to make sure they are operating in the
way the audit says they are operating.
Moorehouse asked why they were discussing compliance
and findings. She asked why Lane County
would need an audit.
Stewart wanted a report back on the current diversity plan
that exists at HACSA. He also wanted
meeting minutes about things that had been discussed and reviewed.
Green requested an action plan that had been
implemented for the past year. He
wanted to see what had been done and the timetables.
Fleenor wanted a report back on the process of how
they are dismissing employees due to budget cutbacks.
4. CONSENT CALENDAR
a. Approval of Minutes: None.
b. RESOLUTION AND ORDER 07-5-2-2H/In the Matter
of Extending Workers' Compensation Coverage to HACSA Volunteers.
MOTION: to
approve the Consent Calendar.
Green MOVED, Fleenor SECONDED.
VOTE: 6-0
(Dwyer out of room).
5. EXECUTIVE SESSION as per ORS 192.660
None.
There being no further
business, Commissioner Stewart adjourned the meeting at 9:50 a.m.
Melissa Zimmer
Recording Secretary